Michael
BuSo Pro
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2016
- Messages
- 312
- Likes
- 205
- Degree
- 1
Is the idea behind this to find related key phrases to your main keyword, but by avoiding phrase matching keywords?
E.G.
Main KW: best cheap lawn mower
LSI KWs: lawn mowers under 200, cheap lawn mowers, cheap 2 stroke lawn mowers
So the LSI keywords have the same underlying meaning - The user wants a cheap lawn mower.
But I haven't kept stuffing keywords like 'best cheap lawn mower for farms' , 'best cheap lawn mowers no catcher' which would be considered the old way to rank? (now I can see why, you're using that best cheap lawn mower prefix far too often, and would look like you're trying to game Google by increasing the keyword density.
Is this the right approach? Would I then go ahead and sprinkle those LSI terms throughout the article?
E.G.
Main KW: best cheap lawn mower
LSI KWs: lawn mowers under 200, cheap lawn mowers, cheap 2 stroke lawn mowers
So the LSI keywords have the same underlying meaning - The user wants a cheap lawn mower.
But I haven't kept stuffing keywords like 'best cheap lawn mower for farms' , 'best cheap lawn mowers no catcher' which would be considered the old way to rank? (now I can see why, you're using that best cheap lawn mower prefix far too often, and would look like you're trying to game Google by increasing the keyword density.
Is this the right approach? Would I then go ahead and sprinkle those LSI terms throughout the article?