- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 6,229
- Likes
- 13,100
- Degree
- 9
PART 1: Culture & Society
Each culture in each society constructs a narrative for it's members to live by.
The purpose of this narrative is to create cohesion and reduce friction between it's members, thereby maximizing unity and minimizing internal warfare. The reason for this is that it provides the highest likelihood for the largest amount of people to survive and thrive, biologically and psychologically.
The problem is, you are not among the "largest amount of people."
Interestingly, the largest group of average people also have it in their interest to protect the "low performers" as well, because this removes a lot of negative elements from their own psychological make-up (fear, guilt, etc.) and adds positives (compassion, self-praise).
Until at least 75% of people on the planet reach a sense of global community, society and it's cultures will only care for it's own people, it's in-group. The entire point of all of this is to protect themselves physically and ideologically from outsiders.
You will provide the best products and services ever to them, and they will happily give you money for it, because that's all very impersonal. They don't mind allocating impersonal physical resources to a nameless you. But when it becomes personal and they learn about the CEO, it doesn't matter how much good you do. You will be hated by most because what you offer in return, psychologically, requires them not to be average. It asks them to burst through comfort, to stop reinforcing each other's averageness. But that's exactly what culture and society is for. The entire point is to maximize comfort and enjoyment while minimizing effort, and they resent the fact that high performers are the ones who have provided that through all of history.
Each culture in each society constructs a narrative for it's members to live by.
The purpose of this narrative is to create cohesion and reduce friction between it's members, thereby maximizing unity and minimizing internal warfare. The reason for this is that it provides the highest likelihood for the largest amount of people to survive and thrive, biologically and psychologically.
The problem is, you are not among the "largest amount of people."
Interestingly, the largest group of average people also have it in their interest to protect the "low performers" as well, because this removes a lot of negative elements from their own psychological make-up (fear, guilt, etc.) and adds positives (compassion, self-praise).
Until at least 75% of people on the planet reach a sense of global community, society and it's cultures will only care for it's own people, it's in-group. The entire point of all of this is to protect themselves physically and ideologically from outsiders.
Guess what you are? An Outsider.
Here's the problem... unlike low performers who can provide psychological value to the average bulk of people by needing them, high performers do nothing but cause fear, jealousy, envy, and guilt to flare up in their average heads. You don't need them... they need you.
You will provide the best products and services ever to them, and they will happily give you money for it, because that's all very impersonal. They don't mind allocating impersonal physical resources to a nameless you. But when it becomes personal and they learn about the CEO, it doesn't matter how much good you do. You will be hated by most because what you offer in return, psychologically, requires them not to be average. It asks them to burst through comfort, to stop reinforcing each other's averageness. But that's exactly what culture and society is for. The entire point is to maximize comfort and enjoyment while minimizing effort, and they resent the fact that high performers are the ones who have provided that through all of history.