The Kloser
BuSo Pro
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2016
- Messages
- 115
- Likes
- 67
- Degree
- 0
Do you find the following definition from Google of Direct Traffic Source to be correct?
direct)[(none)] - Visitors who visited the site by typing the URL directly into their browser. 'Direct' can also refer to the visitors who clicked on the links from their bookmarks/favorites, untagged links within emails, or links from documents that don't include tracking variables (such as PDFs or Word documents).
Looking at stats in Analytics, I found it to be little odd to have managed a growth of 500%+ from traffic classified as Direct while other traffic sources i.e Social, Organic, Referral... the gains there were insignificant to make an impact. How is this even possible? Whiteout growing the other source channels, I would think that Direct Traffic would have stayed the same as well.
direct)[(none)] - Visitors who visited the site by typing the URL directly into their browser. 'Direct' can also refer to the visitors who clicked on the links from their bookmarks/favorites, untagged links within emails, or links from documents that don't include tracking variables (such as PDFs or Word documents).
Looking at stats in Analytics, I found it to be little odd to have managed a growth of 500%+ from traffic classified as Direct while other traffic sources i.e Social, Organic, Referral... the gains there were insignificant to make an impact. How is this even possible? Whiteout growing the other source channels, I would think that Direct Traffic would have stayed the same as well.