- Joined
- May 27, 2016
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 54
- Degree
- 0
Inc.com has started reporting brands/companies/websites that they have found to have paid for links/content to be written on their platform. The FTC considers the advertiser (the brands/companies/websites) at fault not the platform (Inc.com) - basically the person would most likely bought the link and has the most to gain from link placement.
"It's a very clear violation of our ethics policy, and we will terminate our relationship with any columnist found to have done this," Inc.'s editor, Jim Ledbetter, told me when I asked him how we handle this kind of scam. "I don't have any reason to think that it has occurred more than a handful of times, but any behavior like this is a violation of the trust Inc. has with its readers."
"There are ways to police it," he added, "but I'd rather not make those public."
[..]
We believe brands going behind our back in this way is indeed deceptive, and Inc. has filed a formal complaint with the FTC concerning these practices. As for now, we'll continue to hew to our zero-tolerance policy for such shenanigans, and we'll continue to be vigilant in policing such infractions.
"There are ways to police it," he added, "but I'd rather not make those public."
[..]
We believe brands going behind our back in this way is indeed deceptive, and Inc. has filed a formal complaint with the FTC concerning these practices. As for now, we'll continue to hew to our zero-tolerance policy for such shenanigans, and we'll continue to be vigilant in policing such infractions.
Source: http://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/contributor-marketers-ftc.html