Paying big for a large Negative Keyword List for the Drug Rehab Industry.

tim2963

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
38
Likes
36
Degree
0
Firstly I'm sorry if this an inappropriate post or if it is posted in the wrong section.

I'm looking to start a large project with a few people on this forum and we are in serious need for a list of negative keywords in the drug rehab industry. Others here can vouch for me that I'm a decent guy who pays well, so if you have access to his PM me please!

Thanks guys.
 
I am assuming you mean for ppc campaign right?
In my oppinion it depends on the projects specifics, what is the goal of the project/campaign, if you are looking to sell a product you'd generaly avoid any kw's related to research/study of the industry.
Also is it B2B or B2C.
Sorry I can't be more helpfull, but in my opinion the list changes from project to project.
 
is there a chance you could pm me the kw' and potentially the landingpage/pages, Don't worry wont be looking to compete with you, just to wrap my head a little more arronnd it and not waste anyones time
 
Honestly if you aren't in the industry in some way you won't be able to help. Those free tools like the wordstream one aren't going to cut it.

Negative keywords for Drug Addiction are the bread and butter of the campaigns. Including all of the names of famous celebrities that went to rehab over the past 80-100 years, knowing which areas are best for which insurance types, cutting out all of the people who don't have PPO insurance. It's a pain in the ass. You need a list of around 5k-20k negative keys. Our competitors run lists of that size and they spend over 1mil a month in PPC fees.
 
I have never use free tools to research negative kw. Then again I only do work with some of the biggest medicine companies in the world as my clients, granted they are not in the drug and rehab industry, but I'd say I know it pretty well.

Anyway sorry for having wasted your time. I guess it's time to get your research gloves on your self sir.
 
No need to take offense man, it is nothing against you. The top rehab facilities have multiple people on staff just for adding negative keywords to their PPC campaigns around the clock. It's not just a quick thing you can throw together.

Seriously dude, no offense at all, I wasn't attacking you.
 
none taken.

just one last thing, hopefully obvious but always worth a mention, consider more options than just FB and adwords, there are plenty and they are cheaper plus some of them gives a higher ROI.
Anyway good luck on the campign
 
lion1978 said:
just one last thing, hopefully obvious but always worth a mention, consider more options than just FB and adwords, there are plenty and they are cheaper plus some of them gives a higher ROI.
Anyway good luck on the campign
Click to expand...

I do appreciate this. There are a few well known directory sites that I'm sure cost a fuckin fortune and some of which are secretly owned by a huge competitor. There were thoughts of purchasing a forum which houses 260k members and has 3.6mil Visits a month 980k uniques and climbing and trying to capitalize off of the forum without changing it around too much, but it is expensive. (Mid 7 figures), any more thoughts like that though would be greatly appreciated.

Here is a list of the "baddest of the bad" health sites in the US, listed in order. But this will be a challenge getting posts on these sites as the "Health" sections often require a PHD to post. Really annoying.

http://www.forbes.com/health/
www.webmd.com
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/health/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/health
http://health.usnews.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/health/index.html
http://www.menshealth.com/
http://www.reuters.com/news/health
http://www.bbc.com/news/health
http://time.com/health/
http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health
http://www.npr.org/sections/health/
http://news.yahoo.com/health/
http://www.livestrong.com/cat/health/
http://www.scientificamerican.com/health-and-medicine/
http://www.today.com/health
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/health/
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/
http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/

But with links like these we should be able to successfully rank and work our way up from the long tail keys, to the moderate keys, then the really difficult ones. So much shit involved though, thousands of pages of content, local offices all over the country, 100s of paid reviews a month, nothing is cheap or easy in this niche. So hoping somebody out there is willing to sell a nice list of these negatives to make life a bit easier on us.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/
 
Last edited:
Yeah that's a hughe mouthfull, you might be able to hit them though if you have some hughe news (weather it's fake or not) just has to be approached the right way.
The idea of buying the forum has massive potential in many ways, the obvious of course is that you'd get to advertise to an active targeted groupe of people, the seccond is you get to sell ad space to your competitors, wherer you can jack the price up as high as you want and there is always something funny about taking money from your competition letting them help funding your business (or maybe I am just evil). It might also be a great place to leak from thinking there has to be some of those forum users who runs blogs that are trusted by at least some of the newspapers, then once they mention you on their blog the snowball is rolling.
Yeah I can understand you'd want to buy the list, and I do hope there are someone out there that has it and are willing to sell it to you.
 
tim2963 said:
I do appreciate this. There are a few well known directory sites that I'm sure cost a fuckin fortune and some of which are secretly owned by a huge competitor. There were thoughts of purchasing a forum which houses 260k members and has 3.6mil Visits a month 980k uniques and climbing and trying to capitalize off of the forum without changing it around too much, but it is expensive. (Mid 7 figures), any more thoughts like that though would be greatly appreciated.

Here is a list of the "baddest of the bad" health sites in the US, listed in order. But this will be a challenge getting posts on these sites as the "Health" sections often require a PHD to post. Really annoying.

http://www.forbes.com/health/
www.webmd.com
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/health/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/health
http://health.usnews.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/health/index.html
http://www.menshealth.com/
http://www.reuters.com/news/health
http://www.bbc.com/news/health
http://time.com/health/
http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health
http://www.npr.org/sections/health/
http://news.yahoo.com/health/
http://www.livestrong.com/cat/health/
http://www.scientificamerican.com/health-and-medicine/
http://www.today.com/health
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/health/
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/
http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/

But with links like these we should be able to successfully rank and work our way up from the long tail keys, to the moderate keys, then the really difficult ones. So much shit involved though, thousands of pages of content, local offices all over the country, 100s of paid reviews a month, nothing is cheap or easy in this niche. So hoping somebody out there is willing to sell a nice list of these negatives to make life a bit easier on us.
Click to expand...

Are you running the same business model where you take a share of profit?

I'm guessing you're going to hire a PHD to submit content to these sites. That could probably get really expensive(I'm imagining 1000-2000$ per high quality piece of content that you get onto these sites?).

But guessing its in the drug rehab niche, its probably very worth it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back