- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 239
- Likes
- 64
- Degree
- 0
From what I've read, there is no penalty for having duplicate content on your site. The only downside seems to be that you don't reap the SEO benefits that the owner of the original article does (and should.)
But when you're just starting out and have no money to outsource rewrites, nor the time to keep up with a busy editorial calendar all by yourself, the though of just ripping articles and putting them on your site comes to mind.
Even though you most likely won't rank for any keywords, your site will still look like an aged site that people will come back to visit for what some may believe to be original articles. And that's traffic you can instantly monetize.
Compare this to rewriting an article by yourself one by one or paying $10 for someone else to do it for you. Google rankings aside...the benefits are the same, are they not?
So what's the harm here in doing this to at least get initial traffic?
But when you're just starting out and have no money to outsource rewrites, nor the time to keep up with a busy editorial calendar all by yourself, the though of just ripping articles and putting them on your site comes to mind.
Even though you most likely won't rank for any keywords, your site will still look like an aged site that people will come back to visit for what some may believe to be original articles. And that's traffic you can instantly monetize.
Compare this to rewriting an article by yourself one by one or paying $10 for someone else to do it for you. Google rankings aside...the benefits are the same, are they not?
So what's the harm here in doing this to at least get initial traffic?