Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.serptrust.io/blog/traffic-analysis-comparison-ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-serpstat/
Yeah seen it this morning and nearly shit but then checked others and its almost the exact same pattern of drop across all the sites I looked at.I see it too, and it doesn't correlate with a dip in my actual traffic analytics or in Ahrefs. Ahrefs has recently adjusted their traffic estimates (too? Maybe SEMRush is doing this but not historically) and their numbers can be really bonkers (incredibly low, like a fraction of a fraction low) on some sites.
We've always found serpstat by FAR the closest of them all when we have access to the real traffic stats. Often AHREFS was 10-20x lower than the real site traffic etc. But people just are so obsessed with AHREFS these days. SEMRush def better than AHREFS but like you say still a good few multiples out.So saw this yesterday from Serptrust but they posted the following:
Code:https://www.serptrust.io/blog/traffic-analysis-comparison-ahrefs-vs-semrush-vs-serpstat/
TL;DR
The results
Ahrefs: they perform worst of all because GSC traffic estimates are on average 4.03 times higher.
Semrush: second best as GSC traffic estimates are only 2.53 times higher.
SerpStat: surprisingly comes out of the winner, they have the tendency to over-estimate a lot and that’s helping them here as GSC is only 1.305 times higher.
---
Sample size is pretty small in the grand scheme of things only being 56 sites but still something to look at in comparison to actual GSC data.
Agree with you.We've always found serpstat by FAR the closest of them all when we have access to the real traffic stats. Often AHREFS was 10-20x lower than the real site traffic etc. But people just are so obsessed with AHREFS these days. SEMRush def better than AHREFS but like you say still a good few multiples out.