MinstrelJunkie
BuSo Pro
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2020
- Messages
- 179
- Likes
- 350
- Degree
- 1
I feel like I know the answer to this question already, but want to ask anyway:
Should you include yourself on your website? As in, use your own name and profile picture, etc. I'm setting up new sites and plan to write a bunch of articles for them - so naturally I want to create an author bio for myself.
In this case I'd just be listed as the site operator, mixed in with several writer profiles.
Here's my thoughts:
Pros to including yourself:
Wondering if anyone has any experience of any positives/negatives from either case. Hope it's okay to tag you both - @secretagentdad & @MrMedia I believe you've weighed in on using aliases before. Appreciate any and all thoughts.
Should you include yourself on your website? As in, use your own name and profile picture, etc. I'm setting up new sites and plan to write a bunch of articles for them - so naturally I want to create an author bio for myself.
In this case I'd just be listed as the site operator, mixed in with several writer profiles.
Here's my thoughts:
Pros to including yourself:
- Natural, don't need to overthink anything
- Good for EAT if you're known elsewhere
- Can use own socials for links/EAT
- No need to pretend you're someone different in outreach
- No overthinking of "does this appear real" and so on
- More authentic
- Slightly harder to sell (key man risk). (Mitigated by not being heavily involved)
- If sharing metrics on socials, it could attract competitors or alert big sites who could demolish you
- You need to basically 'create' a person in terms of background / socials / EAT signals
- Remembering to 'be' that persona in outreach and communications
Wondering if anyone has any experience of any positives/negatives from either case. Hope it's okay to tag you both - @secretagentdad & @MrMedia I believe you've weighed in on using aliases before. Appreciate any and all thoughts.